This article is a summary of issues with the 2020 vice presidential debate between Mike Pence and Kamala Harris. Video segments of the debate are presented by topic, with their claims examined for accuracy.
A Summary of Issues With the 2020 Vice Presidential Debate
by Edward Ulrich, updated November 11, 2020
This is the full video of the broadcast. I have also segmented video clips from it and summarized them in the sections of this article.
Jump to parts of this article ..
Issues With CBS’s Pre-Debate Commentary
Debate Introduction
Mike Pence and Kamala Harris Debating About the Coronavirus Issue
Immigration Was Never Spoken About in the Debate, And It Will Not Be Mentioned In Any Of the Other Presidential Debates Either
Mike Pence and Kamala Harris Debating Climate Change Issues
Mike Pence and Kamala Harris Debating Criminal Justice Issues
Mike Pence and Kamala Harris are Asked What They Would do if Trump “Refuses a Peaceful Transfer of Power”
Issues With the Post-Debate Commentary
Debate Introduction
Mike Pence and Kamala Harris Debating About the Coronavirus Issue
Immigration Was Never Spoken About in the Debate, And It Will Not Be Mentioned In Any Of the Other Presidential Debates Either
Mike Pence and Kamala Harris Debating Climate Change Issues
Mike Pence and Kamala Harris Debating Criminal Justice Issues
Mike Pence and Kamala Harris are Asked What They Would do if Trump “Refuses a Peaceful Transfer of Power”
Issues With the Post-Debate Commentary
Issues With CBS’s Pre-Debate Commentary
This section explains issues with the pre-debate commentary of the CBS news broadcast of the debate, where it can be seen that the coverage is extremely biased against Pence and toward Harris.
The video in this section is a compilation of the excerpts that are spoken about.
— The video segment starts by showing the news anchor say that the Midwest and Great Plains of the United States are becoming “hot spots” for Covid, and she explains that Anthony Fauci says that deaths from it could double by the end of the year.
— Then, a former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and senior advisor to Hillary Clinton named Philippe Reines talks, where he says in a tone as if he is reporting the news: “Donald Trump is going to lose this race. I don’t know by how much, but he’s going to lose this race, and loosing it for the very reasons that— If you just [turn the sound off when watching the debate], you are seeing plexiglass between the nominees, you are seeing nobody really there except sixty people spaced apart. Americans are DYING, the country is in absolute terrible shape. There is not much Mike Pence can do to make everyone forgot that, and the fact that he is even going to TRY is a sign of the problem that the Trump team has.”
— Reines then later says, “[If it was me debating Mike Pence], I would talk to the camera, saying ... that I’m sitting next to someone who didn’t even want to be separated [with plexiglass]. You know what, Mike? I don’t want to be separated with plexiglass between us either, but the reason we are is because you guys can’t get this straight.”
— Later Reines says, “.. At nine o’clock, when Kamala Harris, the first black woman on a major party ticket comes out, it is going to be electrifying. The fact that she’s next to a guy that is so white he’s almost clear is going to make that even more so. In terms of their interactions, I could see Mike Pence not looking like he is really comfortable talking to someone of the other sex ... I think Mike Pence has practiced a lot [with women playing Kamala Harris, in order to] not “mansplain,” not be idiotic. ...”
“Not to be particularly snotty about it, but the Republican party, you know, can’t find a black woman to play a black woman to help a white guy get used to being on the stage with a black woman, it is really pretty telling.”
... The anchor then interjects off camera: “But does that matter, Philippe?” To which he replies, “(Gulp).. Yea..?”
— Later Reines comments that Pence will “be a machine” in attacking Harris irregardless of her race and gender, actually implying that it is improper for him to do that!— “He’s a machine, he is going to go after her I think irrespective of gender in a way that I almost respect. If the criteria is that you treat someone different because of race or gender, I think Mike Pence is going to be as much of a machine attack dog as he would be against a twin of himself, now that might not be likable, and it might not look great, but you know .. She’s electrifying, he’s a wet blanket, so that’s the true reality of the two of them as people and their backgrounds in the same place. There’s nothing exciting about: ‘Oh my god! Look, there’s another white guy on stage tonight.’”
— At about 28:00 in the full video, they spoke with the Republican National Committee Senior Advisor Katie Walsh Shields, but they only gave her a few minutes to speak before the debate started.
This section explains issues with the pre-debate commentary of the CBS news broadcast of the debate, where it can be seen that the coverage is extremely biased against Pence and toward Harris.
The video in this section is a compilation of the excerpts that are spoken about.
— The video segment starts by showing the news anchor say that the Midwest and Great Plains of the United States are becoming “hot spots” for Covid, and she explains that Anthony Fauci says that deaths from it could double by the end of the year.
— Then, a former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and senior advisor to Hillary Clinton named Philippe Reines talks, where he says in a tone as if he is reporting the news: “Donald Trump is going to lose this race. I don’t know by how much, but he’s going to lose this race, and loosing it for the very reasons that— If you just [turn the sound off when watching the debate], you are seeing plexiglass between the nominees, you are seeing nobody really there except sixty people spaced apart. Americans are DYING, the country is in absolute terrible shape. There is not much Mike Pence can do to make everyone forgot that, and the fact that he is even going to TRY is a sign of the problem that the Trump team has.”
— Reines then later says, “[If it was me debating Mike Pence], I would talk to the camera, saying ... that I’m sitting next to someone who didn’t even want to be separated [with plexiglass]. You know what, Mike? I don’t want to be separated with plexiglass between us either, but the reason we are is because you guys can’t get this straight.”
NOTE: I think it is strange that so many pro-Biden proponents are blaming “Trump” exclusively for Covid when everyone knows that it is a “global” pandemic, not to mention the fact that everyone knows that Trump is following rather extreme measures to supposedly counter it. Thus such proponents must know that their comments are appearing to be ridiculous to most people; so perhaps they are somehow “secretly” trying make Trump “look good” as some sort of a favor to him because he is actually “playing ball” with the Establishment’s agendas with Covid, such as his promoting the development of vaccines, and his not firing Anthony Fauci. I don’t think Trump is as good as many of his supporters believe he is, but he is preferable to Biden nonetheless.
— Later Reines says, “.. At nine o’clock, when Kamala Harris, the first black woman on a major party ticket comes out, it is going to be electrifying. The fact that she’s next to a guy that is so white he’s almost clear is going to make that even more so. In terms of their interactions, I could see Mike Pence not looking like he is really comfortable talking to someone of the other sex ... I think Mike Pence has practiced a lot [with women playing Kamala Harris, in order to] not “mansplain,” not be idiotic. ...”
“Not to be particularly snotty about it, but the Republican party, you know, can’t find a black woman to play a black woman to help a white guy get used to being on the stage with a black woman, it is really pretty telling.”
... The anchor then interjects off camera: “But does that matter, Philippe?” To which he replies, “(Gulp).. Yea..?”
— Later Reines comments that Pence will “be a machine” in attacking Harris irregardless of her race and gender, actually implying that it is improper for him to do that!— “He’s a machine, he is going to go after her I think irrespective of gender in a way that I almost respect. If the criteria is that you treat someone different because of race or gender, I think Mike Pence is going to be as much of a machine attack dog as he would be against a twin of himself, now that might not be likable, and it might not look great, but you know .. She’s electrifying, he’s a wet blanket, so that’s the true reality of the two of them as people and their backgrounds in the same place. There’s nothing exciting about: ‘Oh my god! Look, there’s another white guy on stage tonight.’”
NOTE: As the comments of Reines shows, not only does the political Establishment count on people to subconsciously not criticize politicians for “politically correct” reasons, but sometimes they actually even openly advocate for that! Comments after the debate have the same tone as well, as is shown later in this article.
Another example of that mentality is this NPR article where Trump is criticized for calling Harris “a monster.” The article essentially says that Harris and other women such as members of “The Squad” should be exempt from such criticism since they are “women of color.”
Another example of that mentality is this NPR article where Trump is criticized for calling Harris “a monster.” The article essentially says that Harris and other women such as members of “The Squad” should be exempt from such criticism since they are “women of color.”
— At about 28:00 in the full video, they spoke with the Republican National Committee Senior Advisor Katie Walsh Shields, but they only gave her a few minutes to speak before the debate started.
Debate Introduction
The moderator Susan Page introduces the debate and the candidates, and she says that nobody knows the questions that she will ask. She also explains that the debate will be divided into nine segments of about ten minutes each.
NOTE: Why was Harris on the LEFT side, despite the fact that she is the challenger in the debate? Who decided that? How was it decided? That makes a big difference in the perception of the candidates. Is it because she is a woman? Surprisingly I didn’t find any information about that online. Could you imagine what people would say if they put TRUMP on the right side during his debate? Why should it be any different for the vice president?
The moderator Susan Page introduces the debate and the candidates, and she says that nobody knows the questions that she will ask. She also explains that the debate will be divided into nine segments of about ten minutes each.
NOTE: Why was Harris on the LEFT side, despite the fact that she is the challenger in the debate? Who decided that? How was it decided? That makes a big difference in the perception of the candidates. Is it because she is a woman? Surprisingly I didn’t find any information about that online. Could you imagine what people would say if they put TRUMP on the right side during his debate? Why should it be any different for the vice president?
Mike Pence and Kamala Harris Debating About the Coronavirus Issue
When Harris and Pence were asked about the Coronavirus issue, Harris continually repeated a baseless claim of “It is all Trump’s fault,” claiming that her and Biden would handle the situation much better; however in truth the biggest difference would be that her and Biden would be more corrupt and needlessly totalitarian in their approach. Unfortunately though, Trump is also often appeasing the corrupt political Establishment with his decisions about the matter.
— The first question was about the Coronavirus, where Harris was asked what a Biden administration would do about it that a Trump administration wouldn’t do. Harris responded by saying “The American people have witnessed the greatest failure of any Presidential administration in the history of our country”.. and she went on to give statistics about the amount of people who died, placing all the blame on Trump, claiming that he didn’t act quickly enough. At the same time she blamed the businesses that are closed on Trump, suggesting that if he acted more quickly then somehow nothing would currently need to be shut down.
NOTE: The risk from Coronavirus is being exaggerated by the political Establishment for corrupt purposes. Some people such as the elderly and people with immunity issues are at risk and steps should be taken to protect them, however younger people are generally not particularly in danger, even according to official explanations of the virus.
— Harris then says that she and Biden have a “plan” of what to do about the Coronavirus, that includes: “a national strategy for contact tracing, for testing, for the administration of the vaccine, and making sure that it will be free for all.” [NOTE: I think that sounds oppressive and dystopian.]
— Page then said that the death toll in the U.S. from Coronavirus is higher in the U.S. than in any other developed country, and she asked Pence why that was. Pence then answered with an annoying opening statement showing his strange personality quirks, saying, “Susan thank you, and I want to thank the commission and the University of Utah for hosting this event, and Senator Harris— It’s a privilege to be on the stage with you.” [NOTE: Why would he say something like that to someone such as Harris who he knows is dishonest and corrupt? And why would debating her be a “privilege” for him anyway since he is the person who is currently in office? He makes similar annoying statements later in the debate as well, unfortunately.]
— Pence then explained that Trump in fact suspended all travel from China, which Joe Biden actually opposed while calling it “Xenophobic” and “Hysterical.” [NOTE: Also, Nancy Pelosi was advocating that people go to Chinatown in San Francisco in response to Trump’s decision at that time, yet she also then later accused Trump of “not doing enough soon enough!”]
NOTE: It is at this moment when Harris starts a weird and dishonest habit that she continues throughout the entire debate, where she shakes her head “no” in a disgusted patronizing fashion in response to any and all statements that criticize her or Biden or the Democrats, or even just to statements that simply portrait Trump in a positive light, as if the ultimate untruth is being spoken— no matter how true the statements actually are!
— Pence also talked about the development of a vaccine that was started in February, saying, “The reality is, when you look at the Biden plan, it reads an awful lot like what President Trump and I, and our task force, have been doing every step of the way, and quite frankly, when I look at their plan that talks about advancing testing, creating new PPE, developing a vaccine, it looks a little bit like plagiarism, which is something Joe Biden knows a little bit about, and I think the American people know that this is a President that has put the American people first ..”
Among the long list of issues with Joe Biden, he has a history of plagiarism and academic dishonesty which the media mostly covers up:
— Biden claimed to graduate in the “top half” of his class when in fact he graduated 76th out of 85, and he also claimed to attend Syracuse law school on a full scholarship as the only member of his law class to do so, when he actually attended on a half scholarship based on financial need.
— Biden claimed he had been named the outstanding student in the political science department as an undergraduate at the University of Delaware, and that he had graduated with three undergraduate degrees, when he actually received a single degree with a double major and he did not win such an award.
— Biden had plagiarized speeches by the British politician Neil Kinnock, who was the leader of the British Labor Party, and he also plagiarized a law review article in portions of a class paper that he wrote in law school.
— Biden claimed to graduate in the “top half” of his class when in fact he graduated 76th out of 85, and he also claimed to attend Syracuse law school on a full scholarship as the only member of his law class to do so, when he actually attended on a half scholarship based on financial need.
— Biden claimed he had been named the outstanding student in the political science department as an undergraduate at the University of Delaware, and that he had graduated with three undergraduate degrees, when he actually received a single degree with a double major and he did not win such an award.
— Biden had plagiarized speeches by the British politician Neil Kinnock, who was the leader of the British Labor Party, and he also plagiarized a law review article in portions of a class paper that he wrote in law school.
NOTE: Trump’s agendas with Covid, such as the development of a vaccine, are unfortunately mostly in line with the corrupt agendas of the political Establishment, and Harris’ criticisms of him are actually just her saying that “he isn’t going far enough” with his implementation of those agendas.
Trump initially had much healthier attitudes in being opposed to vaccines, but he has recently been implementing policies such as “fast tracking” the development of a vaccine for Covid. Perhaps the reason he is doing that is because he fears that he will loose the election otherwise, or even perhaps because he worries that the political Establishment might harm him if he goes too much against their corrupt agendas.
As mentioned previously, the Coronavirus is not much more dangerous than the normal flu to people who are not elderly or who do not have compromised immune systems, and reports of the numbers of Coronavirus cases are being exaggerated by the political Establishment for ulterior motives.
Also, Democrat governors in the states of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Michigan have been caught deliberately sending Covid-infected patients into nursing homes in order to raise the death tolls, and Trump’s justice department is requesting data in its consideration of investigating that matter.
Pence undoubtedly knows about all of that, yet unfortunately he did not mention it in the debate.
In any event, Biden and Harris would be even more invasive and totalitarian than what is currently happening with the lockdowns, at the instructions of the global elite.
Trump initially had much healthier attitudes in being opposed to vaccines, but he has recently been implementing policies such as “fast tracking” the development of a vaccine for Covid. Perhaps the reason he is doing that is because he fears that he will loose the election otherwise, or even perhaps because he worries that the political Establishment might harm him if he goes too much against their corrupt agendas.
As mentioned previously, the Coronavirus is not much more dangerous than the normal flu to people who are not elderly or who do not have compromised immune systems, and reports of the numbers of Coronavirus cases are being exaggerated by the political Establishment for ulterior motives.
Also, Democrat governors in the states of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Michigan have been caught deliberately sending Covid-infected patients into nursing homes in order to raise the death tolls, and Trump’s justice department is requesting data in its consideration of investigating that matter.
Pence undoubtedly knows about all of that, yet unfortunately he did not mention it in the debate.
In any event, Biden and Harris would be even more invasive and totalitarian than what is currently happening with the lockdowns, at the instructions of the global elite.
— Harris then said, “Whatever the administration has done, clearly it hasn’t worked, and you are looking at over 210 thousand dead bodies in our country. ...,” and then she continued to harp on the mostly baseless claims that she already made about “Trump knowing about it and not doing anything,” and when Pence protested, she made a dramatic statement of: “Mr. Vice President, I’m speaking— I’m speaking!” And then she said, “I want to ask the American people. How calm were you when you were panicked about where you where going to get your next roll of toilet paper? How calm were you when your kids were sent home from school and you didn’t know when they could go back? How calm where you when your children couldn’t see your parents because you were afraid you could kill them?”
— Pence then replied by saying, “The reality is Dr. Fauci said everything that he told the President in the oval office, the President told the American people. ...”
Dr. Judy Mikovits Exposing the Corruption of Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates
NOTE: A lot of deception does exist that is associated with the Coronavirus, however Harris is not criticizing any of the significant issues with it; instead she is advocating in the totally opposite direction towards even more corruption.
I don’t like how Dr. Fauci appears to be idolized by both Pence and Harris. Fauci is a tool of the corrupt political Establishment, as the following video in this section explains. (I think Trump is preferable to Biden but he is far from perfect, he should have fired or sidelined Fauci, and he and Pence shouldn’t be developing and promoting the Establishment’s vaccines.)
In this video, Dr. Judy Mikovits, a lab virus HIV/AIDS whistleblower, exposes the Coronavirus Task Force director Anthony Fauci along with Bill Gates for having corrupt agendas associated with the Covid Pandemic. Mikovits was previously associated with Anthony Fauci, and she is the author of the book “Plague of Corruption: Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science.”
NOTE: A lot of deception does exist that is associated with the Coronavirus, however Harris is not criticizing any of the significant issues with it; instead she is advocating in the totally opposite direction towards even more corruption.
I don’t like how Dr. Fauci appears to be idolized by both Pence and Harris. Fauci is a tool of the corrupt political Establishment, as the following video in this section explains. (I think Trump is preferable to Biden but he is far from perfect, he should have fired or sidelined Fauci, and he and Pence shouldn’t be developing and promoting the Establishment’s vaccines.)
In this video, Dr. Judy Mikovits, a lab virus HIV/AIDS whistleblower, exposes the Coronavirus Task Force director Anthony Fauci along with Bill Gates for having corrupt agendas associated with the Covid Pandemic. Mikovits was previously associated with Anthony Fauci, and she is the author of the book “Plague of Corruption: Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science.”
— Pence then said, “We actually know what failure looks like in a pandemic. It was 2009. The Swine flu arrived in the United States. Thankfully it ended up not being as lethal as the Coronavirus. But before the end of the year, when Joe Biden was Vice-President of the United States, not one and a half million people contracted the Swine Flu— [but rather] 60 million people contracted the Swine flu. If the Swine Flu had been as lethal as the Coronavirus, in 2009 we would have lost 2 million American lives. ...”
This radio interview that took place eleven years ago is very relevant today with the Coronavirus issue that is currently occuring:
recorded April 29, 2009, running time 45 minutes
Alex Jones speaks with Len Horowitz, the author of “Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola— Nature, Accident or Intentional?”, discussing issues during the international outbreak of Swine Flu in 2009. Horowitz is an authority in the fields of public health, behavioral science, emerging diseases, and natural healing. Discussed is evidence that the flu outbreak was intentionally created for the purpose of profiting drug companies, empowering globalist agendas, forwarding depopulation agendas, and being used as a “smokescreen” to distract the populace from other issues.
IMMIGRATION was never spoken about in the debate, and it will not be mentioned in any of the other presidential debates either
Page never asked any questions about immigration during the debate, despite it being one of the most important and contested issues.
This Breitbart article explains that the moderator Page has a very pro-migration bias, and another Breitbart article explains that the supposedly “bipartisan” presidential debate commission is made up of Establishment figures who are intentionally not bringing up the topic of immigration to be talked about.
See this article and this article talking about extreme agendas that Biden / Harris and the Democrats in general have with immigration.
Page never asked any questions about immigration during the debate, despite it being one of the most important and contested issues.
This Breitbart article explains that the moderator Page has a very pro-migration bias, and another Breitbart article explains that the supposedly “bipartisan” presidential debate commission is made up of Establishment figures who are intentionally not bringing up the topic of immigration to be talked about.
See this article and this article talking about extreme agendas that Biden / Harris and the Democrats in general have with immigration.
Mike Pence and Kamala Harris Debating Climate Change Issues
The topic of climate change is one where the corruption of the political Establishment shows itself to farcical levels. The global elite desperately want people to think that global warming is a “dangerous global threat” in order for them to have an excuse for “cracking down” and controlling the countries of the world via invasive regulations and taxation.
The real truth of the matter— that the most genuine and uncorrupted science shows, is that climate change is a natural occurrence that is NOT caused by CO2 in the air, but rather it is mostly caused by normally occurring long-term cycles of solar activity.
Even more important is the fact that the actual effects of the warming climate are much less than what the political Establishment is trying to make people think it is. For example sea levels will only rise by very small amounts, and it is absolutely true that there are no more hurricanes today than there were a century ago, despite the incredibly dishonest claims of essentially all Establishment media outlets.
Unfortunately though, Pence does not really address the fraud of climate change alarmism or tell the truth about man-made climate change being a myth. Republicans used to do that more often, but the political Establishment ultimately runs both parties, and the Establishment’s invasive climate change regulations are very central to their plans for a totalitarian New World Order, as this informative video by Michael Coffman explains in detail.
Perhaps Pence and Trump are concerned that they would “lose votes” if they addressed the genuine truth about the fraud of climate change alarmism, but the truth is the truth nonetheless. (At least they aren’t ACTING on the myth of man-made climate change, however they aren’t really helping to eliminate the potential of the issue being exploited by Democrats for corrupt purposes in the future though.)
This video by Millie Weaver that was created before the 2020 election explains the draconian “Green New Deal” agendas that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris will implement if they win the election.
Weaver explains that Biden intents to create a “White House climate change task force” and environmental “green police” groups that monitor the activities of citizens, with those groups also being associated with agendas to abolish the police.
Joe Biden and Kamala Harris want to enter the U.S. in the “Paris Climate Accord,” which is yet another corrupt power grab by the political elite that would be absolutely damaging to the United States.
Listen to the following Alex Jones broadcasts that expose the agendas of similar previous attempts to force fraudulent climate change regulations on the people of the world:
recorded December 8, 2009, running time 20 minutes
Alex Jones speaks about issues with the 2009 Copenhagen Convention on Climate Change Treaty, explaining that its purpose is to deceptively empower an unelected global government that is controlled by private banks. It is explained that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank have been exploiting third world countries in the past and will continue their exploitation under the new treaties despite the countries being promised otherwise. Also discussed are common examples of propaganda that help to explain attitudes in the scientific community as well as how environmental issues are being used to forward ulterior motives.
recorded November 2, 2009, running time 40 minutes
In this November 2, 2009 broadcast, Alex Jones gives an overview of an upcoming “Framework Convention on Climate Change” treaty which has been drafted by a Rockefeller Foundation funded body of the United Nations. Jones reads through sections of the document while mentioning aspects of concern, detailing issues of the treaty serving to greatly empower a world government that is run by non-elected private bankers. Also mentioned are issues with inaccurate propaganda put out by many media outlets concerning global warming, as well as agendas of extreme population reduction which are often associated with global warming legislation.
Mike Pence and Kamala Harris Debating Criminal Justice Issues
People should realize that people of all races are killed by police in more or less equal proportions when the amount of violent crimes committed by those demographics are figured into the statistics, as all studies show. The political Establishment has various corrupt ulterior motives for falsely creating a perception that the police have a “homicidal bias” against black people, including to intentionally increase crime in black areas, to create racial animosity towards white people, to federalize local police forces to bring them more under the control of the corrupt political Establishment, as well as to replace police with corrupt Marxist “community patrols.” The following videos detail many such issues. See this article and this article for written summaries of the following videos, as well as for additional information.
Most people don’t understand how the political Establishment has been deceiving the public in order to create and heighten racial conflict in the United States.
In this video, Paul Watson of Infowars.com explains statistics that show that people of all races are killed by police in relatively equal proportions in the US, and that the organization Black Lives Matter is created and controlled by the Establishment in order to create racial animosity.
See the video page for a written description of the information in this video.
In this video, Paul Watson of Infowars.com explains statistics that show that people of all races are killed by police in relatively equal proportions in the US, and that the organization Black Lives Matter is created and controlled by the Establishment in order to create racial animosity.
See the video page for a written description of the information in this video.
From the Prager University YouTube video page: “Are the police racist? Do they disproportionately shoot African-Americans? Are incidents in places like Ferguson and Baltimore evidence of systemic discrimination? Heather Mac Donald, a scholar at the Manhattan Institute, explains.”
Heather Mac Donald is the author of the book “The War on Cops.”
See the video page for a written description of the information in this video.
Heather Mac Donald is the author of the book “The War on Cops.”
See the video page for a written description of the information in this video.
[Note: I often still see the Rodney King incident that happened in 1992 being mentioned by activists, however that situation was distorted by the media in a similar manner as recent events. The news reports at the time intentionally withheld the full video footage showing that King initially attacked the police officers, which the media strategically hid to create a public impression that King was more of a victim than he actually was in order to cause the riots that happened after the trial.]
(Start watching at 7:45 in the above video to see the important details about the Rodney King incident.)
About the issue of a fly landing on Pence’s head
While Mike Pence was speaking, a fly landed on his head, which has become a big talking point in the leftist entertainment media such as on late night talk shows; however such shows never mention that a fly also landed on Hillary Clinton’s face and on her hand that was holding her microphone during a 2016 debate with Donald Trump.
This CNN video talks about the issue of the fly landing on Hillary when she was debating Donald Trump. I think it is strange how CNN became so blatantly biased and dishonest after Trump won the election, yet it was not that really that way any more than the rest of the media before that. I frequently looked at it by habit in the past when I wanted to see what the mainstream media was reporting, and I actually still look at it, but now I do so to see what sort of biased reporting they are engaging in.
I actually think it is possible that the political Establishment got the idea to artifically ADD the fly into the debate video of Pence after it previously happened to Hillary— in a manner similar to how the mainstream media recently uniformly accused Trump of calling troops “losers and suckers” (without any proof!) when in fact they knew that it was about to be revealed that Joe Biden said “clap you stupid bastards” to troops. It would be a simple matter for them to add the fly into the video, and they are certainly corrupt enough to do such a thing.
The fly landed on his head at the moment when he started talking about how the police don’t actually have a homicidal bias, as he was making the totally true and healthy statement in a non-divisive manner. The political Establishment does NOT want the truth to be known about what he was explaining, so if they were going to “add” such an artifact using computer graphics, that would certainly be the moment when they would do it.
Notice also that he didn’t react to the fly, and Harris didn’t react to it either despite the fact that her reactions were exaggerated and over-the-top about everything else that was happening during the debate. With the mentality she was constantly displaying, wouldn’t she at least snicker about it? She certainly would have been able to see it from where she was.
While Mike Pence was speaking, a fly landed on his head, which has become a big talking point in the leftist entertainment media such as on late night talk shows; however such shows never mention that a fly also landed on Hillary Clinton’s face and on her hand that was holding her microphone during a 2016 debate with Donald Trump.
This CNN video talks about the issue of the fly landing on Hillary when she was debating Donald Trump. I think it is strange how CNN became so blatantly biased and dishonest after Trump won the election, yet it was not that really that way any more than the rest of the media before that. I frequently looked at it by habit in the past when I wanted to see what the mainstream media was reporting, and I actually still look at it, but now I do so to see what sort of biased reporting they are engaging in.
I actually think it is possible that the political Establishment got the idea to artifically ADD the fly into the debate video of Pence after it previously happened to Hillary— in a manner similar to how the mainstream media recently uniformly accused Trump of calling troops “losers and suckers” (without any proof!) when in fact they knew that it was about to be revealed that Joe Biden said “clap you stupid bastards” to troops. It would be a simple matter for them to add the fly into the video, and they are certainly corrupt enough to do such a thing.
The fly landed on his head at the moment when he started talking about how the police don’t actually have a homicidal bias, as he was making the totally true and healthy statement in a non-divisive manner. The political Establishment does NOT want the truth to be known about what he was explaining, so if they were going to “add” such an artifact using computer graphics, that would certainly be the moment when they would do it.
Notice also that he didn’t react to the fly, and Harris didn’t react to it either despite the fact that her reactions were exaggerated and over-the-top about everything else that was happening during the debate. With the mentality she was constantly displaying, wouldn’t she at least snicker about it? She certainly would have been able to see it from where she was.
Mike Pence and Kamala Harris are Asked What They Would do if Trump “Refuses a Peaceful Transfer of Power”
The moderator’s final question was ridiculously biased, but Pence handled it very well. I think it is funny that Harris mentioned that her and Biden have the support of many Republicans, but the ones that she mentioned are among the most corrupt of the Neocons such as George Bush.
See this article on Word View Weekend talking about Hillary spying on Trump, among many other issues with her: “WAY WORSE THAN WATERGATE: The Truth is Out But the Media Wants to Cover It Up.”
The moderator’s final question was ridiculously biased, but Pence handled it very well. I think it is funny that Harris mentioned that her and Biden have the support of many Republicans, but the ones that she mentioned are among the most corrupt of the Neocons such as George Bush.
See this article on Word View Weekend talking about Hillary spying on Trump, among many other issues with her: “WAY WORSE THAN WATERGATE: The Truth is Out But the Media Wants to Cover It Up.”
Issues With the Post-Debate Commentary
(Note the full broadcast contains a lot of post-debate commentary that I have not included here. Watch the video on the top of this article to see all of it.)
The video in this section is a compilation of the excerpts that are spoken about.
After the debate, the commentators often focused on the fact that Harris is a “woman of color,” actually having a sexist and patronizing attitude when talking about her based on that, and they said that since Pence is a male and he “interrupted Harris when she was speaking,” that it will likely cause suburban women to decide to vote for Biden instead.
At the very end of the broadcast, a pundit goes on a strangely ridiculous rant attempting to deny that there is any possibility of fraud occurring with the mail-in voting that is happening:
... Despite the pundit’s false claims, there IS in fact much evidence of fraud happening with the mail-in-ballots. See the following links to news stories about that matter:
[Note: November 11, 2020— The organization Project Vertias had reported about allegations of the congresswoman Ilhan Omar being involved in a “cash-for-votes scheme,” but apparently it turns out that the proof of that is in question due to many of the sources being anonymous, so I have taken the links off that mention that. However, there are plenty of other examples of vote fraud and issues with the mail-in ballots. I have added three new articles today, they are the following ones in a bold font.]
Massive Vote Fraud Across U.S. as Trump Decries Attempted Coup (The New American) — “Reports, videos, and other evidence of rampant and brazen voter fraud from all across the country — especially in jurisdictions controlled by Democrats — continue pouring in faster than the Big Tech giants can censor it and the fake ‘fact-checking’ industry can dishonestly attempt to discredit it. ...”
Democrat voter fraud in Pennsylvania is explained as states flip for Trump (Infowars) — “Owen Shroyder is live at the State Capitol Building in Tallahassee, Florida as the Stop The Steal Caravan continues its journey to DC as more Democrat fraud is uncovered in Pennsylvania.”
The Pennsylvania Secretary of State overseeing the voting said Trump was ‘dangerously unfit’ for office, and ‘demeaning’ to the presidency (The National Pulse) — “Boockvar, who previously served as senior election modernization adviser to the critical swing state’s Governor, now heads Pennsylvania’s Department of State. The department is ‘responsible for monitoring all aspects of an election, from ballot access to voting provisions’ - of paramount importance in light of Pennsylvania’s integral and contested status as of November 4th. ... Boockvar, however, can hardly be seen as a neutral arbiter.”
Confessions of a voter fraud: I was a master at fixing mail-in ballots
Trump may win election night, but Joe Biden will win days later due to mail-in votes, according to a Bloomberg-funded group
A Michigan judge extended the deadline two weeks for mail-in ballots postmarked by November 2
Hulk Hogan claims his friend received a mail-in ballot for his dog
A surveillance camera has captured a ‘huge pile of mail’ dumped in California parking lots
(Note the full broadcast contains a lot of post-debate commentary that I have not included here. Watch the video on the top of this article to see all of it.)
The video in this section is a compilation of the excerpts that are spoken about.
After the debate, the commentators often focused on the fact that Harris is a “woman of color,” actually having a sexist and patronizing attitude when talking about her based on that, and they said that since Pence is a male and he “interrupted Harris when she was speaking,” that it will likely cause suburban women to decide to vote for Biden instead.
At the very end of the broadcast, a pundit goes on a strangely ridiculous rant attempting to deny that there is any possibility of fraud occurring with the mail-in voting that is happening:
On the question of wether or not increased mail-in-balloting is a pathway to rampant fraud, the evidence is clear, it is not. And the continued assertion by President Trump and Vice President Pence that it is, is false. It is simply not true.
And what I find astonishing about this continued pattern of deception, is that this is the ticket and this is the administration that embraces and hugs so ardently the idea of American exceptionalism, except when America conducts an election. Apparently there, we are all either frauds, bumblers, incompetents, or fools. That has nothing to do with American exceptionalism. And I wonder if they actually believe that Americans are hell-bent on creating an atmosphere of crime around a Presidential election.
I see no evidence of it, there is no evidence to point to, to suggest that’s true, and yet this assertion comes from not just the President, but the Vice President. It can only have one purpose— to sew confusion and doubt. Well, on election night, that doubt will come up against voters who cast their ballots and render their own judgement, and we’ll see what happens.
And what I find astonishing about this continued pattern of deception, is that this is the ticket and this is the administration that embraces and hugs so ardently the idea of American exceptionalism, except when America conducts an election. Apparently there, we are all either frauds, bumblers, incompetents, or fools. That has nothing to do with American exceptionalism. And I wonder if they actually believe that Americans are hell-bent on creating an atmosphere of crime around a Presidential election.
I see no evidence of it, there is no evidence to point to, to suggest that’s true, and yet this assertion comes from not just the President, but the Vice President. It can only have one purpose— to sew confusion and doubt. Well, on election night, that doubt will come up against voters who cast their ballots and render their own judgement, and we’ll see what happens.
... Despite the pundit’s false claims, there IS in fact much evidence of fraud happening with the mail-in-ballots. See the following links to news stories about that matter:
[Note: November 11, 2020— The organization Project Vertias had reported about allegations of the congresswoman Ilhan Omar being involved in a “cash-for-votes scheme,” but apparently it turns out that the proof of that is in question due to many of the sources being anonymous, so I have taken the links off that mention that. However, there are plenty of other examples of vote fraud and issues with the mail-in ballots. I have added three new articles today, they are the following ones in a bold font.]
Massive Vote Fraud Across U.S. as Trump Decries Attempted Coup (The New American) — “Reports, videos, and other evidence of rampant and brazen voter fraud from all across the country — especially in jurisdictions controlled by Democrats — continue pouring in faster than the Big Tech giants can censor it and the fake ‘fact-checking’ industry can dishonestly attempt to discredit it. ...”
Democrat voter fraud in Pennsylvania is explained as states flip for Trump (Infowars) — “Owen Shroyder is live at the State Capitol Building in Tallahassee, Florida as the Stop The Steal Caravan continues its journey to DC as more Democrat fraud is uncovered in Pennsylvania.”
The Pennsylvania Secretary of State overseeing the voting said Trump was ‘dangerously unfit’ for office, and ‘demeaning’ to the presidency (The National Pulse) — “Boockvar, who previously served as senior election modernization adviser to the critical swing state’s Governor, now heads Pennsylvania’s Department of State. The department is ‘responsible for monitoring all aspects of an election, from ballot access to voting provisions’ - of paramount importance in light of Pennsylvania’s integral and contested status as of November 4th. ... Boockvar, however, can hardly be seen as a neutral arbiter.”
Confessions of a voter fraud: I was a master at fixing mail-in ballots
Trump may win election night, but Joe Biden will win days later due to mail-in votes, according to a Bloomberg-funded group
A Michigan judge extended the deadline two weeks for mail-in ballots postmarked by November 2
Hulk Hogan claims his friend received a mail-in ballot for his dog
A surveillance camera has captured a ‘huge pile of mail’ dumped in California parking lots
UPDATED Much vote fraud likely occurred in the 2024 election despite Trump winning [updated November 13, 2024]
updated November 13, 2024
UPDATED RFK jr. should disavow his supposed associations with a Hitler-praising apparently controlled opposition activist
updated November 12, 2024
New York City has been buying one-way plane tickets for its illegal migrants to move elsewhere, apparently prompting the recent federal persecution of its mayor Eric Adams
September 28, 2024
FederalizeVotingStandards.org advocates for eliminating the use of electronic voting machines
updated September 15, 2022
Audio: Alex Jones Speaks With Len Horowitz About Issues of the 2009 Swine Flu Outbreak
recorded April 29, 2009
running time 45 minutes
Deriving the Most Effective Activist Communication for Creating Political Change
updated February 18, 2020
